When did gamers expect reviews to not be critical?
Uncharted is one of those very rare game series that I, and my small group of gaming friends, all very much enjoy. I must stress how rare this is: I cannot think of any other game, let alone a series of games, that we aren't all deeply divided on. M'colleague over there is part of that group, and I'm sure he'll be writing about why Uncharted is so entertaining.
I'm not sure how Naughty Dog is doing things like this and not having the PS3 burst into flamesI'd like to first take a look at the recent controversy over a handful of seemingly 'negative' reviews for Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception. A quick trip to Metacritic paints Uncharted 3 easily as a unanimous game of the year contender. But hang on: stop the press! An eight?! From Eurogamer?! How dare they besmirch the holy grail that is Uncharted! How dare they pick apart Drake's flaws! How dare they provide reasoned and well-written arguments, completely backing up their review score? It's an outrage! Clearly they are shoddy reviewers, just keen on creating controversy with their entirely valid criticisms!
How dare they provide reasoned and well-written arguments, completely backing up their review score?
The response to these small number of reviews has completely blown me away. The sheer malice and bile being directed at these reviews is nothing short of incredulous. Many gaming websites have picked up on the reaction to these reviews, offering up reasons why fans react in such a manner, with my personal pick resting upon Patrick Klepek's (of Giant Bomb) insight. He posits that 'individuals seek out information favoring their already established opinion'. For a revered series like Uncharted, any points of contention (of which there are certainly a few) that are highlighted are taken like a personal insult.
While I lack the word count and professional credentials to look deeply into gaming psychology, I will say that reactions like these are one of a good handful of habits that damage the reputation that video games have. We already have to contend with outlets like Fox News jumping on the 'games cause violence' train: let's not give them any more ammunition, shall we?
Rock, Paper, Shotgun summarised the debate rather nicely.But onto the game! The formula from Uncharted 2 to 3 has not changed as much as Uncharted 1 to 2, but it doesn't matter: Uncharted 3 takes everything that worked brilliantly in Uncharted 2 and raises them to new levels of story, gameplay and character maturity.
This is a perfect pulp adventure.
Everything about Uncharted revolves around a theory (that I made up, but is possibly floating around elsewhere) that story is king. Every stylistic choice, every set, every shot has been meticulously created to benefit the story.
Uncharted 3 is one of those games that makes you dearly wish that what you're seeing exists somewhere in the real world, so you can visit it personallyThis is a perfect pulp adventure, taking the very best of what cinema has been delivering for years and also ensuring there's a competent game attached as well. It doesn't break new ground in the realm of third-person action shooters, but it does what it sets out to achieve incredibly well. It's a pure thrill to watch Drake and co. on their journey: it's been quite a while since a game really grabbed my attention in such a way.

The Online Pass System
Tell us who deserves the Shine Get or simply comment away. Or both.